Book Excerpt

Table for one

The strain — and satisfaction — of eating alone

By
July 25, 2007

I wait tables in a restaurant at the hub of Portland’s foodie culture, an industrial-chic destination spot where the chairs are hard and the food is fresh, local, and very fine, but not in a traditional “fine dining” way. There are no starched white shirts or black pants; it’s all about the food. We’ve cultivated relationships with the people who grow and tend what we serve, and taken field trips to their farms, vineyards, and slaughterhouses.

To risk sounding like I have an altar to Alice Waters in the corner of my bedroom, I truly believe that a meal is the culmination of an entire journey, from birth to death to table. It’s a journey that includes, and is colored by, every person involved — not least, the person who eats it.

But tonight, late, alone in my clean, white, and rarely cooked-in kitchen, I’m eating cold refried beans out of the can. And it’s not the first time.

At the restaurant, the staff is fed incredibly well. At the end of a shift, the chef piles the carving table high with the surplus of our daily-changing menu. Tonight, for example, there was creamy Anson Mills polenta; mesquite-grilled, locally-raised lamb; bulls blood beets with gremolata; black cod with prosecco butter; garlicky escarole; and braised fennel.

We sit at a long wooden table to eat, drink, talk, and do our paperwork. Some of us have worked together for years. This communion sometimes takes on a heightened significance, the way eating with family can remind us of the thousands of times we’ve come together in the same way.

But tonight I didn’t eat anything. My paperwork was snarled and frustrating, and I’d had a customer so determined to be and stay unhappy that I was now unhappy as well, and all I wanted was a glass of wine. Okay, two glasses of wine.

And hours later, I’m hungry and alone. Though the edge of my temporary unhappiness has been dulled by wine, my dinner options are revealed by the cold, yellow refrigerator light: wilted lettuce, aging eggs, a vast number of condiments, and a bottle of cold-pressed flaxseed oil.

Solitude doesn’t have to be lonely.

Sinclair, my fat, aging black cat, is sprawled across the piles of books and papers on my kitchen table, and I watch him stretch, carefully knock two books off the table, and then act startled. I laugh as I’m supposed to, then open the cupboard, the contents of which seem odd and inexplicable. Why do I have so many cans of creamed corn? Why do I have so many baking supplies when I haven’t used my oven in over a year?

And then I see a can of Rosarita’s vegetarian refried beans, nearly hidden behind the whey powder. At the sound of the can opener, Sinclair jumps off the table and weaves around my ankles. I let him sniff the beans’ slick surface; he turns away. “I know. It’s completely disgusting,” I tell him, fishing a spoon out of the drawer.

Years ago I read an article in a women’s magazine that said self-care for singles should include a sumptuous meal made for you and only you, eaten on a table cleared of papers and letters and cats and set with a placemat, a matching napkin, and a spray of bluebonnets in a vase. I don’t remember which magazine it was, but I very well remember thinking, “That’s a perfectly lovely idea that’s never, ever going to happen.” (And furthermore, why not a more easily procured flower, like a rose or a tulip?)

But what was being espoused, of course, was the notion that you are valuable, you alone, and that beautiful, carefully prepared food is just as important for a table of one as a table of 20.

And I agreed, in theory. But in practice, eating alone feels wrong. I’m so accustomed to eating with people, and serving people who are eating with people, that the social aspect of it seems inextricable from any other step on that journey from farm to table. Without the shared appreciation, a meal might as well not exist, like a book with no one to read it except the author.

And as I lean against the edge of the counter, eating my refried beans as quickly as I can to avoid really tasting them, I feel a rush of shame as I remember the very particular woman who ate alone at the restaurant three or four nights a week for nearly six months.

She was an immediate irritation to the staff. The first time she dined with us, she showed up six minutes before the kitchen closed and stood at the host stand impatiently, arms crossed in front of her chest. Her bare, unlined face suggested youth, but her floor-length skirt and sensible cardigan did not. I was disheartened; a single diner always means a lower check, and she definitely didn’t look like a drinker. And I’d thought my night was nearly over.

Single diners can be awkward. Some are lonely and want a lot of attention; some are nervous, embarrassed to be eating alone, and their discomfort is contagious. It’s hard for me not to create a story around a single diner, as eating alone in a restaurant is an uncomfortable intersection between the public and the private. Serving the single diner I feel like a voyeur, and also guilty if I wonder why he or she is alone. After all, why is anyone alone, finally?

But this woman didn’t seem lonely, nor did she want to be engaged. She simply wanted things exactly the way she wanted them. After I gave her one of the small flashlights we offer all our customers (our restaurant is known for its rather intimate darkness), she demanded that I give her some of the votive candles off neighboring tables. Satisfied only after 10 brightly burning candles illuminated her surroundings, she ordered room-temperature mineral water, and then promptly returned her glass because it smelled of detergent. Her precision was strange and sort of gorgeous, and I was a little in awe of her as I brought her a new, non-smelling glass.

Displaying page 1 of 2.

First Page Previous Page 1 2 Next Page Last Page
Subscribe
Comments
There are 11 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by rachel b. on Jul 25, 2007 at 12:08 PM PDT

Great article!

2. by Tim Gray on Jul 25, 2007 at 2:22 PM PDT

I eat alone most everyday, in resturants because of work travel and at home because I’m single. At home, I always try to at least sit at the table, with a placemat, silverware and napkin (paper towel), but never a flower. I usually heat the beans. Enjoyed the article.

3. by lindsay. on Jul 25, 2007 at 11:54 PM PDT

I enjoyed your article - thanks!

4. by Holly on Jul 26, 2007 at 6:25 AM PDT

Lovely writing, poignant point made. Good work!

5. by stefanie on Jul 27, 2007 at 8:25 PM PDT

When my cat was alive, he was always overwhelmingly enthusiastic about joining me in a can of beans...

6. by angwyshaunce on Jul 30, 2007 at 10:38 AM PDT

As someone who’s single and recently moved to a new city, I very much identify with both perspectives in your article - it’s easier, when you’re alone, to eat whatever you can scrap together, than it is to spend time, effort, and money on a nice meal. Over the last two years, though, I have found a certain unique enjoyment in dining well by myself, whether at a restaurant or at home... as you describe, it allows a certain intimacy with your meal that is often set aside when you are in company. Of course, I too still fall prey to the by-myself-blahs and open the occasional can of refried beans...

I enjoyed your article, thanks so much for sharing!

7. by bipolarlawyercook on Jul 31, 2007 at 3:44 AM PDT

Nice article-- I picked up the book recently in a store and have added it to my “to buy” pile after reading your article.

I do fall prey to snarfing something without thought in front of the computer, but I often treat myself to dinner out in the alternative-- when I am too tired to cook for myself, and I feel like I need to be taken care of, it’s out I go. Very rarely am I cursed with single diner Siberia-- although I also often eat at the bar, with a book.

8. by anonymous on Oct 26, 2007 at 3:14 PM PDT

Wow. You come off as the biggest food snob I’ve ever had the mispleasure of reading. In addition to your mother, get used to a lot more people tuning you out.

People dine alone for more reasons than you apparently can comprehend. Climb down from the pedestal you’ve placed yourself on and join us common folk who eat simply because we enjoy food, be it a can of beans or a fancy meal out.

9. by june2 on Nov 7, 2007 at 9:22 PM PST

Huh...you didn’t come off to me as a snob of any sort. Strange.

Anyhoo ~ I love eating out alone, and though it is very wonderful to share food with someone, it certainly doesn’t stop me from completely enjoying eating out by myself because in a restaurant, I feel surrounded by the ambiance of all of us eating together and it feels just great! I also go to movies alone, which I actually prefer for some reason. Am I odd?

10. by Carrie Floyd on Nov 8, 2007 at 10:23 AM PST

june2,
I also like going to the movies alone (when I go with someone else I can’t help but wonder how he or she is perceiving the movie, when I go alone it’s just me, the movie, and a single popcorn all to myself). In college I had a roommate who wouldn’t go to the cafeteria without a companion, she felt too self conscious eating alone. That had never occured to me (I guess I like to eat too much). I like eating alone, and I love cooking for myself—figuring out exactly what I want and making it. Maybe this has something to do with where I am in my life right now; as the mother of two and the cook of four, I appreciate time alone, I value cooking/eating a meal that solely pleases me. (That said, even when I was young and single I could spend a happy afternoon reading cook books, imaging food I would make, only to make a fried-egg sandwich for dinner—an oh-so-satifying meal for one.)

11. by jane on Jan 29, 2008 at 5:02 PM PST

I, too, cook for myself often and also eat out alone at times. I find myself frequently defending cooking for one, as though it’s some kind of self-indulgent, freakish event. My guess is that people who wouldn’t cook for themselves probably wouldn’t cook much for other people, which is nothing to apologize for. But it would make me truly sad to bypass the amazing produce we have access to in Portland. I use cooking as a way to experiment and taste every single thing that grows in every season, to sharpen my own cooking skills, and to just delight in something that’s meditative and makes the kitchen feel alive. But it ain’t everyone’s thing.

Add a comment

Think before you type

Culinate welcomes comments that are on-topic, clean, and courteous. For the benefit of the community we reserve the right to delete comments that contain advertising, personal attacks, profanity, or which are thinly disguised attempts to promote another website.

Please enter your comment

Format: Bare URLs are automatically linked; use this style: [http://www.example.com "place text to be linked here"] for prettier links. You may specify *bold* or _italic_ text. No HTML please.

Please identify yourself

Not a member? Sign up!

Please prove that you’re not a computer


First Person

Contributions from farmers, cooks, and others who are tasting the many meanings of food.

Want more? Comb the archives.

Advertisement
Our Table

Health on the side

Nutritious substitutes for starchy side dishes

Easy switcheroos.

Subscribe
Graze: Bites from the Site
The Culinate 8

Breads of India

Flatbreads from around the continent

Local Flavors

Using the whole vegetable

Leaf love

The Produce Diaries

Leeks

Beyond a supporting role

First Person

La Cosa Nostra

The great Sicilian-Neapolitan kitchen rivalry

Editor’s Choice