Job wanted

Food-poisoning lawyer looking for work

By
July 31, 2009

Editor’s note: The top headlines this morning were about the cash for clunkers program and the famous beer gathering at the White House. And — of course — there was plenty of discussion about health care.

Although it didn’t generate big headlines, yesterday’s vote in Congress to pass a food-safety bill may have a far-reaching effect. We asked food-safety litigator Bill Marler to give us his read on the vote.

Yesterday, after a bit of drama on Wednesday, HR 2749 — The Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009 — passed overwhelmingly and with serious bipartisan support. It is now headed to the Senate with a likely stopover at a conference committee before it lands on the President’s desk.

“HR 2749 will . . . increase the overall safety of our food.”

Frankly, I may need to start looking for a new job. As I penned a few days ago, in 2002, in the middle of the recall of 21 million pounds of E. coli O157:H7-tainted ConAgra beef that sickened 50 Americans and killed one grandmother, I wrote an op-ed saying that it was time to “put me out of business.”

My argument was that since people generally hate trial lawyers like me, the best way to get rid of me would be to stop poisoning people with contaminated food.

Since that outbreak, millions more have been sickened and permanently disabled by food tainted with salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, listeria, campylobacter, and other pathogens. Thousands have lost their lives. In that same time period, Congress had more than 20 hearings on food safety — many attended by my clients — but had not enacted comprehensive legislation.

Well, “change,” the official Obama phrase, has come to Capitol Hill.

The bill, many times amended (Why? Perhaps this is for a later blog post) and nearly 200 pages long, will greatly strengthen the FDA’s power to regulate 80 percent of the food economy. HR 2749 will give the FDA the power to order food recalls and set record-keeping standards for food facilities. It will mandate increased frequency of inspections and have the fees to pay for them. There will be stiffer criminal penalties, and imports will have to meet the same standard as products produced in the U.S.

What it certainly will do is reduce the enormous number of food-borne illness outbreaks, keep kids out of ICUs and off dialysis, and increase the overall safety of our food.

HR 2749 is the first meaningful food-safety legislation in 50 years. It was time for the left to stop making perfect the enemy of good. It was time for the right to get out of the way of consumer protection in the name of industry protection. It was time for all of us to acknowledge that ensuring safety in a sprawling, global food system is not free, nor without pain. It was past time for every part of the food economy — regardless of size — to become part of the system, to share in the costs of the system, and to promote the safety of the system.

It has always been really long past time to “put me out of business.”

Bill Marler is a Seattle-based lawyer specializing in food-safety issues. Read more on his blog or follow him on Twitter (@bmarler).

Subscribe
Comments
There are 5 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Breann on Jul 31, 2009 at 1:27 PM PDT

While I absolutely agree that a better food structure is needed, it seems to me that this bill is penalizing those who haven’t had problems with contamination in the past while giving the true problematic industry giants more leeway.
If we were raising meat, and all food really, in a healthy manner, these issues would not be happening. A ban on the dangerous factory farms and on using antibiotics in animal production would be a lovely start.
For more information, I invite you to look at www.foodrenegade.com
Thank you.

2. by anonymous on Aug 3, 2009 at 6:21 AM PDT

seriously, is this guy great at self-marketing or what?

3. by Kim on Aug 4, 2009 at 3:17 PM PDT

Many bloggers have weighed in on this bill, including Eddie Gehman Kohan, Tom Philpott, and Barry Estabrook. The one-size-fits-all approach to food legislation doesn’t always work well (as can be seen in farmer Anthony Boutard’s dispiriting series of posts, parts 1 2 and 3, about the dilemmas faced by small-scale Oregon farmers caught in the mix with much larger farms). We’ll be watching what happens to this bill when the Senate takes it up in the fall.

4. by Sarah on Aug 6, 2009 at 4:50 AM PDT

I strongly agree with Breann. We don’t need more bureaucracy, we need animals to be raised healthfully and humanely. If cows were allowed to eat grass, which is what they should eat and would eat, if it were up to them, they would be so much more healthy that we wouldn’t need all the antibiotics and hormones we currently pump into them.
This bill will make it more difficult for small, struggling beef producers (who are raising thier animals as grass-fed and trying to “do the right thing” and have not had any instances of E.Coli...EVER) to stay in business. I think that’s the real deal here...Big agribusiness has a very strong lobby!

5. by stepsins on Aug 25, 2009 at 11:07 AM PDT

If we are improving all meat and true food, in a healthy way, these problems will not happen. A prohibition will be and a lovely beginning after using antibiotic in animal’s production process about the dangerous factory farm.

Add a comment

Think before you type

Culinate welcomes comments that are on-topic, clean, and courteous. For the benefit of the community we reserve the right to delete comments that contain advertising, personal attacks, profanity, or which are thinly disguised attempts to promote another website.

Please enter your comment

Format: Bare URLs are automatically linked; use this style: [http://www.example.com "place text to be linked here"] for prettier links. You may specify *bold* or _italic_ text. No HTML please.

Please identify yourself

Not a member? Sign up!

Please prove that you’re not a computer


Opinion

The opinion page provides a forum for discussion of ideas and issues in the food world that we feel are relevant to Culinate’s readers.

Got a well-written opinion about food? Seen a great Culinate-worthy editorial? We welcome submission of op-ed pieces.

Want more? Comb the archives.

Advertisement
Table Talk

Table Talk: November 17

A local-foods feast

Josh Viertel and Jennifer Maiser want to help you have a local-foods Thanksgiving. Read the transcript of their online chat.

Subscribe
Graze: Bites from the Site
Local Flavors

The beauty of breadcrumbs

Cherish the humble crumb

The Produce Diaries

Chia seeds

The latest superfood

First Person

Dinner of a lifetime

A changed man

Opinion

The evolution of fresh food

Back to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market

Most Popular Articles

Editor’s Choice