Caroline, our managing editor, sent me a note yesterday:
Here are the ingredients in a box of SuperMoist cake mix from Betty Crocker.
She might have just walked the 10 steps in to my office to read me this list, but then she’d have to twist her tongue in unnatural ways:
Sugar, Enriched Flour Bleached (Wheat Flour, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Partially Hydrogenated Soybean and/or Cottonseed Oil, Cocoa Processed with Alkali, Nonfat Milk, Modified Corn Starch, Corn Starch, Propylene Glycol, Monoesters of Fatty Acids, Carob Powder, Baking Soda, Salt, Sodium Aluminum Phosphate, Distilled Monoglycerides, Dicalcium Phosphate, Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate, Datem, Monoglycerides, Xanthan Gum, Artificial Flavor, Aluminum Sulfate.
I am pleased to see that several of these ingredients are also key ingredients in anti-perspirants and deodorants. Yum!
Not yum. Ew. What are we thinking when we eat propylene glycol?
We all know that spoiled food tastes bad to us. Our taste buds, along with our eyes and noses, help protect us from things we shouldn’t eat. But what about food whose names sound bad?
“Marinated Olives” has a nice ring to it, and “Carrie’s Chocolate Cake” is lovely. “Greens with Baked Goat Cheese Rounds” — delicious.
But do we really want to be putting propylene glycol — or aluminum sulfate — in our mouths?
And what about “trans fat”? It sounds like something that should be used to fuel an alternative-energy mobile.
In this week’s feature article, Rebecca Kessler writes that in 1990 it was discovered that trans fats cause big problems: Not only do they raise levels of LDL (“bad” cholesterol), but they lower HDL (“good” cholesterol).
I had been dimly aware that we should avoid trans fats for a while — and keenly aware of it in the last few months, since there’s been so much news about New York City banning artificial trans fats in restaurants.
But I’ll admit, for the better part of the last 17 years — since 1990, that is — I’ve been “blithely munching” crackers and store-bought cookies and the occasional doughnut. And oh, yes, I’ve even bought cake mixes a time or two: Betty Crocker’s “Partially Hydrogenated Soybean and/or Cottonseed Oil” is nothing but trans fat, after all.
Sweet, huh? Well, yes, but also stupid.
I still don’t avoid trans fats at all costs, but I’ll eat fewer of them — thanks in part to Rebecca’s article, and thanks to the wisdom of Marion Nestle, whom Jackleen de La Harpe interviews in this week’s Q&A.
Nestle’s book What to Eat is a hefty tome, but its message is simple and doesn’t stray far from Michael Pollan’s elegant credo: “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.”
It isn’t hard to avoid foods that aren’t good for you. But these days it takes more than our five senses to figure it all out. A little awareness goes a long way, and there’s content on Culinate that can help.
In her most recent Front Burner column, Helen addresses fats in cooking, and on Thursday this week, Matthew will do the same in his column, Unexplained Bacon.
Today Adam, who writes the blog Amateur Gourmet, exposes the heavy use of fats in Ina Garten’s cookbooks (including one of our favorites, The Barefoot Contessa Cookbook). If you’re not at high risk for heart disease, it’s OK to make Ina’s desserts sometimes, but they should be occasional treats.
But then, that’s what treats are, right? Occasional.
Our Table | |
| Pull up a chair. Here’s the spot for dispatches from Editorial Director Kim Carlson and, occasionally, others on our staff. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Egg-boiling essentialsMark Bittman’s gone back to basicsIn his new book, the fundamentals of cooking take center stage. |
ReviewsMycophiliaRevelations from the Weird World of Mushrooms | Our TableEgg-boiling essentialsMark Bittman’s gone back to basics |
Vine to TableGame for winePairing wild fare and the grape | The Produce DiariesMorelsPleasure in the hunt |
There are 3 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Matthew Amster-Burton on Mar 28, 2007 at 9:01 AM PDT
I wonder why you seized on propylene glycol rather than, say, thiamin mononitrate, which sounds much more sinister to me. For that matter, does “monounsaturated fat” sound any better than “trans fat”?
Do you really find it easy to avoid foods that aren’t good for you? It’s hard for me to believe now, but I remember when it was considered scientific fact that margarine was healthier than butter. For that matter, it was orthodoxy until last year that a lowering your intake of fat would reduce your risk of heart disease and cancer--a principle thoroughly demolished by the largest and best funded study to date. Which of the foods we’re sure are bad news today will become tomorrow’s good news?
Choosing natural foods will only take you so far. One common food that I try to avoid is so high in oxalic acid (a potent toxin, the same thing that will kill you if you drink antifreeze) that it interferes with absorption of nutrients, especially calcium, and can cause kidney stones if eaten too frequently. It’s raw spinach.
2. by Kim on Mar 28, 2007 at 11:26 AM PDT
Mamster:
I jumped on propylene glycol because of its presence in deodorants (and in “non-toxic” antifreeze, too). But I’ll acquiesce, a name maybe isn’t the best place to start. There are a lot of components in foods that have chemical names that we would not want to avoid. Perhaps the latest is “pterostilbene,” found in blueberries, which apparently may help to prevent colon cancer (but doesn’t sound appetizing). Monounsaturated fat is another.
We can’t all take the time to be chemists in the kitchen, nor should we want to, but it still makes sense to me to avoid, more often than not, highly processed foods (such as most store-bought cookies and cake mixes with unfamiliar ingredients). I’m not sure if I’m advocating for “natural” foods or not; “simple” maybe a better descriptor.
You make a good point that what was thought to be a good food last year is maybe not thought to be good today — and tomorrow who knows? I too remember when margarine was “good for you,” and one of the most flexible and decent foods I know, eggs, were vilified.
3. by Matthew Amster-Burton on Mar 28, 2007 at 11:39 AM PDT
Of course, I agree, Kim. Basically, I’m as confused as the next person, and I think the fact that I have training in biology makes me that much more confused.
Long live eggs. I look forward to making them the topic of a future column.
Add a comment