In all the recent wars over whether high-fructose corn syrup is the devil in candy coating, nobody ever seriously claimed that the sweet stuff was inherently worse for you than regular table sugar. Now, however, scientists at Princeton are claiming exactly that, saying that HFCS is indeed more unhealthy than its fellow sugary travelers:
Rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained significantly more weight than those with access to table sugar, even when their overall caloric intake was the same.
So now all the retro hoopla over traditional sugar has scientific cred to back it up. Marion Nestle, however, is not convinced.
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Do-over feverRevisiting September’s effortsWhat an essay, grape jelly, and my house have in common. |
Local FlavorsThe beauty of breadcrumbsCherish the humble crumb | The Produce DiariesChia seedsThe latest superfood |
First PersonDinner of a lifetimeA changed man | OpinionThe evolution of fresh foodBack to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market |
There are no comments on this item
Add a comment