My Culinate

Register | Login

Playing chicken with salmonella

What you don’t know might make you very, very sick

By Caroline Cummins
January 22, 2007

Given the E. coli scares of the last few months, it’s no surprise that a majority of Americans responding to a recent online survey by Harris Interactive were concerned about food safety.

According to Harris, at least some of those people also have an increased interest in locally grown foods, which makes sense; there’s something reassuring about the face-to-face exchange you have with the local farmers you see each week at the market or who deliver your CSA basket of organic produce that’s missing when you get your food from mega-growers 1,000 miles away.

But in its January 2007 issue, Consumer Reports published the results of their own tests of 525 fresh, whole chickens bought at stores around the country. Their findings? Organic or antibiotics-free chickens “were more likely to harbor salmonella than were conventionally produced broilers.”

Naked lunch.

The truly shocking numbers? That 83 percent of the chickens purchased, bought “at supermarkets, mass merchandisers, gourmet shops, and natural-food stores,” harbored salmonella or campylobacter, another nasty bug. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the two diseases together sicken about 3.4 million people and kill 700 in the U.S. every year.

Consumer Reports also tested its chickens for antibiotic resistance, a common problem in chickens reared on drug cocktails to ward off disease. Again, a whopping 84 percent of the chickens turned out to be resistant to at least one type of antibiotic. Which means that if you fall ill from eating chicken, the usual drugs to make you better might not work.

The USDA slammed Consumer Reports for “junk science,” claiming the study wasn’t broad enough. But the USDA had already published its own salmonella-study results, in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, stating that the incidence of positive salmonella samples in fresh broiler chickens had increased fourfold between 2000 and 2005, and that a type of salmonella once found primarily in eggs is now appearing in broiler chickens as well.

Meekly, the USDA report suggested voluntary regulations within the meat and poultry industries to solve the problem.

What’s a shopper to do? Well, the usual: wash everything thoroughly, cook chicken to 165 degrees to kill salmonella, and keep the raw and the cooked separate. And talk to your local purveyors; if their answers don’t satisfy, don’t buy.

Subscribe
Advertisement
Comments
There is 1 comment on this item
Add a comment
1. by helenrennie on Feb 1, 2007 at 6:43 AM PST

Hi Caroline,

Wow -- I never realized how wide spread salmonella was in US! Would you happen to know what this means for eggs? For example, if you eat eggs poached or sunny side up with the yolk being runny -- is that a salmonella hazard?

Thanks!
-Helen

Add a comment

Think before you type

Culinate welcomes comments that are on-topic, clean, and courteous. For the benefit of the community we reserve the right to delete comments that contain advertising, personal attacks, profanity, or which are thinly disguised attempts to promote another website.

Please enter your comment

Format: Bare URLs are automatically linked; use this style: [http://www.example.com "link text"] for prettier links. You may specify *bold* or _italic_ text. No HTML please.

Please identify yourself

Not a member? Sign up!

Please prove that you’re not a computer


Sift

Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news.

Want more? Comb the archives.

Our Table
Slow Food Nation Placard

The long road to Slow Food Nation

Thursday: The gathering takes shape

Subscribe