Among the many groups debating the 2007 Farm Bill — environmental lobbies, fast food companies, farmers small and large, both liberal and conservative political groups — perhaps the most impassioned are the foodies, or at least those of us who care deeply about the quality of the food available to us.
This week, Anna Lappé, co-author of Grub: Ideas for an Urban Organic Kitchen and daughter of famous food activist and writer Francis Moore Lappé, added her voice to the discussion in a piece on the Huffington Post.
That there is confusion, misunderstanding, and controversy surrounding this bill is no surprise — it is a sprawling piece of legislation that covers 10 broad areas, or “titles,” from commodity and nutrition programs to forestry, and it allocates more than $90 billion in government funds.
Lappé’s calm, clear voice on the issue is a welcome one, considering how many perspectives and agendas are at work in the debate over the bill. In order to understand the full implications of this bill, Lappé explains, and whom it really affects, it helps to consider what she deems the “two Americas of food”: the America of the “rich and well-located” consumer — those people who have enough money for and easy access to local, fresh, whole foods and fruits and vegetables — and “the rest” of us, who may not have the money or the access to such healthy food.
Unfortunately, most Americans fall into the latter category — stuck with cheap, over-processed, unhealthy food. Much of this situation, Lappé charges, is due to the existing provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill, which will expire in September — hence the inordinate amount of debate and negotiation currently on the table in Congress.
Lappé alleges that the Farm Bill in its current state created the conditions in which commodity crops (corn, soy, wheat, etc.), which are often destined for processing into prepared foods, and huge herds of “factory-farmed” cows dominate the landscape, rather than healthy, local, organic fruits and vegetables. These two commodities — both crops and livestock — consume gigantic amounts of both natural and financial resources. But, given the current legislation, they are profitable; hence, they comprise the dominant mode of agriculture in the U.S. today.
Fortunately, Lappé explains, many aspects of the Farm Bill can be changed or modified in order to shift the American foodscape toward smaller farms and healthier foods, from farms to homes to classrooms. She then singles out best ideas and reforms currently being discussed in Washington. From Lappé’s post:
Every one of the interest groups vested in the 2007 Farm Bill knows that the bill is not just about farmers, but about an entire way of life. With key modifications, this bill could be the single most important player in the movement toward a truly health-conscious, environmentally conscious, and socially conscious food system: not just for the “rich and well-located,” but for everyone.
Also on Culinate: More on a specific Farm Bill petition and basic facts about community-supported agriculture.
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Sandwiches for dessertCookies and ice cream, stackedA little sweat, a big sweet. |
| Most Popular Articles | |
|---|---|
| Most Emailed | |
|---|---|
There are 2 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Claudia on Jun 29, 2007 at 8:45 AM PDT
Lappe’s post highlights the most progressive and important reforms in the American agriculture and food scene, and additional efforts from individuals and organizations for a more sustainable industry can help the Farm Bill make new strides. If you’re looking for sustainable food sources in your area, check out the Eat Well Guide (http://www.eatwellguide.org), a project of the Sustainable Table.
2. by Holly on Jul 3, 2007 at 6:16 PM PDT
This is a helpful, educational article. I am fairly ignorant about the specifics of the Farm Bill but very interested in the future of it. Thanks for the insight.
Add a comment