Using data from the USDA, the New York Times has created a graphic representation of how much more food we eat now than we used to — and what kinds of food we’re eating.
According to the paper, we ate, per person, 16.4 pounds of food per week in 1970. By 2006, we each downed 1.8 pound per week more.
The Times’ editors based their calculations on “food availability,” or the amount of food that’s produced for consumers, accounting for food waste all along the distribution chain, from the farm to the plate.
Some conclusions: Although we eat less dairy than we used to, we eat more vegetables and fruits, meat, fats, sweeteners, and grains.
Said nutrition expert Marion Nestle, writing about the Times piece on her blog: “The article doesn’t say so, but calories went up from about 3,200 to 4,000, an increase of 800 calories per person per day since the 1970s. Why are Americans gaining weight? Duh. There is more food around and we are eating it.”
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Table Talk: November 17A local-foods feastJosh Viertel and Jennifer Maiser want to help you have a local-foods Thanksgiving. Read the transcript of their online chat. |
The Culinate InterviewJacques PépinThe technician | Local FlavorsThe beauty of breadcrumbsCherish the humble crumb |
The Produce DiariesChia seedsThe latest superfood | First PersonDinner of a lifetimeA changed man |
There are 2 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by anonymous on Aug 5, 2008 at 10:10 AM PDT
The figures in your summary are incorrect. The amount eaten in 2006 has increased by 1.8 pounds per WEEK, not per DAY.
2. by Kim on Aug 5, 2008 at 11:39 AM PDT
Thanks, anonymous — you’re absolutely right. We’ve edited the story to reflect the correct information.
Add a comment