In the department of unconventional stances, the Guardian recently ran a short piece arguing in favor of the banana as a low-carbon food. How so? No hothouses required, a long shelf life, and efficient cargo-ship transportation to market. Heck, the fruit even comes with its own biological packaging. But of course, there’s always a catch — or several:
None of which is to say that bananas are too good to be true. Of the hundreds of banana varieties in existence, almost all the ones we get to eat are of the Cavendish variety. The adoption of this monoculture in the pursuit of maximum, cheapest yields has been criticised for degrading land and requiring liberal use of pesticides and fungicides — sometimes at the expense of plantation workers. Furthermore, although land is dramatically better used for bananas than, say, beef in terms of nutrition per hectare, there are still parts of the world in which forests are being cleared for banana plantations.
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Locavore ideals all year longKeeping it close to homeEight tips for local food fans. |
ReviewsMycophiliaRevelations from the Weird World of Mushrooms | Our TableEgg-boiling essentialsMark Bittman’s gone back to basics |
Vine to TableGame for winePairing wild fare and the grape | The Produce DiariesMorelsPleasure in the hunt |
There are no comments on this item
Add a comment