The magazine The American Conservative recently put food reform on its cover, arguing that — despite what you might think of all those liberal hippies shopping at farmers’ markets and growing their own food — fixing our food system is really a conservative cause. And why not? After all, the better-food movement is essentially traditionalist, calling for old ways over new ways, heritage foods over GMO grub, and independent food production over centralized industry. Quibbles? The American Conservative doesn’t care much about food justice.
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Do-over feverRevisiting September’s effortsWhat an essay, grape jelly, and my house have in common. |
Local FlavorsThe beauty of breadcrumbsCherish the humble crumb | The Produce DiariesChia seedsThe latest superfood |
First PersonDinner of a lifetimeA changed man | OpinionThe evolution of fresh foodBack to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market |
There is 1 comment on this item
Add a comment
1. by JudithK on Sep 11, 2008 at 9:57 AM PDT
You state: “the better food movement is essentially traditionalist”. I’m asking, “what do you mean by that?”
After reading the article, I’m completely confused. Was the point of the article to simply afix the label of “conservative” on the food activism movement? Is the author a born-again liberal?
Add a comment