Striking a blow for food safety

A Good Housekeeping article and an E. coli crackdown

By
September 19, 2011

Buried inside the October issue of Good Housekeeping magazine — the one with comedian Ellen DeGeneres on the cover — is an investigative feature by Madeline Drexler titled “Why Your Food Isn’t Safe.” As the magazine proudly noted on its website, in the same week that the issue hit newsstands the USDA finally declared several strains of the notorious E. coli bacteria to be a food “adulterant.” Why is that a big deal? GH explained:

This means that starting in March 2012, certain food producers (such as beef producers) will have to test for these strains and, if they are found, destroy the batch or cook it to kill the bacteria. (Before, people had to fall ill — even die — before the contaminated food was tracked down.)

Of course, it remains to be seen whether the USDA will put any regulatory power behind this new classification; as E.J. Graff pointed out on the American Prospect website, the GH article calls for “a single food oversight system with real enforcement power.”

William Neuman reported in the New York Times that the new E. coli classification simply extends a ban already in place on the deadly O157:H7 E. coli strain to six other seriously harmful strains — and doesn’t include the strain that killed dozens of people in Europe earlier this summer. The meatpacking industry, naturally, has protested the new classification, and, as Neuman made clear, plenty of other toxins are perfectly acceptable in American meat:

It is not illegal to sell fresh meat or poultry containing most toxic bacteria, like salmonella; they are frequently found on groceries’ meat, and thorough cooking typically kills the pathogens.

And who’s really in charge? The USDA, or the FDA? Neuman admitted that’s a tricky one:

The new rule highlighted the patchwork and often confusing nature of food-safety regulation, where most meat is under the jurisdiction of the U.S.D.A. while most other foods, including produce, are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. The F.D.A. already considers it illegal to sell food containing any bacteria, including toxic forms of E. coli or other substances that could make people sick.

Lawsuits, anyone?

Subscribe
Comments
There is 1 comment on this item
Add a comment
1. by Caroline Cummins on Sep 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM PDT

If you want to contact your senators in support of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s Safe Meat and Poultry Act, Good Housekeeping has sample letters available.

Add a comment

Think before you type

Culinate welcomes comments that are on-topic, clean, and courteous. For the benefit of the community we reserve the right to delete comments that contain advertising, personal attacks, profanity, or which are thinly disguised attempts to promote another website.

Please enter your comment

Format: Bare URLs are automatically linked; use this style: [http://www.example.com "place text to be linked here"] for prettier links. You may specify *bold* or _italic_ text. No HTML please.

Please identify yourself

Not a member? Sign up!

Please prove that you’re not a computer


Advertisement
Dinner Guest

The gamification of cooking

Earning points

Most of the time with cooking and eating, the rules are clear.

Subscribe
Graze: Bites from the Site
First Person

The secret sharer

A father’s legacy

The Culinate Interview

Mollie Katzen

The vegetarian-cooking pioneer

Reviews

Down South

Barbecue, tamales, cocktails, and more

Local Flavors

A winter romesco sauce

Good on everything

Editor’s Choice