Water by the numbers

Pick your plastic bottle based on its recycling number

By
January 17, 2008

Editor’s note: Read a more recent article about food- and beverage-storage containers on Culinate.

Bottled water, as we’ve noted before, is bothersome for reasons both environmental and health-related. But what about the bottles themselves? Which kind of bottle is best?

In a recent New York Times article, reporter Alina Tugend hunkered down with a collection of water bottles and got the facts on bottles, both disposable and not. Here’s her verdict.

  1. The best reusable bottles on the market, both for your health and the planet’s, are made from steel or aluminum (such as Kleen Kanteen or SIGG) or glass (such as Aquasana). But glass can break, and steel (especially if you’re prone to losing your water bottles at the soccer field or on the bus) can be pricey.
  2. Next best, part 1: hard bottles (such as Nalgene) made from polycarbonate plastic, usually labeled with the number 7. Like steel and plastic, these bottles are durable and easily washable. But they can leach small amounts of bisphenol A.
  3. Next best, part 2: softer bottles (such as Soma Crystal) made from polyethylene (recycling number 2) or polypropylene (recycling number 5). This is the type of plastic used in yogurt tubs. For obvious reasons (its softness), a bottle made from these types of plastic doesn’t last as long as a Nalgene. But it doesn’t leach bisphenol A.
  4. The least best option is buying a disposable bottle of water — the kind sold in vending machines and in multipacks at grocery stores. These bottles are cheap, but that’s about their only virtue; they’re hard to wash and crumple easily, making them both bacteria-prone and short-lived. (Not to mention the fact that you bought bottled water in them in the first place.) Disposable water bottles are generally made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and are labeled with the recycling number 1. They can leach a trace metal called antimony, but despite the “phthalate” in their name, they don’t actually leach many phthalates.

OK, weekend warriors. Which bottle will it be? As Umbra Fisk pointed out on Grist two years ago, Nalgene actually makes bottles from different types of plastics, so you can ride that environmental scale back and forth trying to decide. But if looks are what really matter, get Slate’s tips on which bottles actually look cool.

Subscribe
Comments
There are 8 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by sarahdlr on Feb 5, 2008 at 6:54 AM PST

I am interested that you imply leaching an estrogen mimetic is a minor detail. It’s pretty serious in fact, unless feminisation is what you are actively seeking.

2. by anonymous on Apr 22, 2008 at 7:48 PM PDT

You people haven’t read the news lately. Back in Aug of 2007 there were news articles about the serious risks of BPA used in polycarbonate bottles with a number 7. Definately not even the second best choice in light of latest findings. Go to CBS news website for more on this subject.

3. by Caroline Cummins on Apr 25, 2008 at 3:18 PM PDT

Anonymous: This article is four months old, back before the latest BPA reports came out and Nalgene and Playtex announced they would no longer use bisphenol A in their products. (Incidentally, Nalgene makes several bottles, only one of which contains bisphenol A.) Stay tuned for more up-to-date stories about plastics on Culinate in the future.

4. by Caroline Cummins on May 12, 2008 at 12:37 PM PDT

Check out Nancy Schatz Alton’s report on food-storage containers, including plastics.

5. by DennyJr on May 17, 2008 at 2:54 PM PDT

My grandma is the first to have told me about this. This is how rumors get started people taking little bits of truth and putting their own “spin” or take on it. Because I have a curious mind I always research things for myself. Here’s a few things I found online. I’m not pro or con on BPA just passing along what I’ve found so far. Search Bisphenol-A at www.fda.gov & www.cdc.gov here’s a couple links for some good bedtime reading, lol. http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/bpa.html
http://www.bisphenol-a.org/index.html

7. by James Berry on May 17, 2008 at 4:09 PM PDT

@DennyJr: thanks for the investigation. I’m quite skeptical of anything from www.bisphenol-a.org, which is a spin site put up by the American Chemistry Council, a plastics industry trade group. Given the industry bias of our government in the last 8+ years, I’m also not particularly trusting of the fda or epa at this point, sad to say. But I guess we all have to decide whom to trust, and whom to put our faith in, and when to be skeptical, paranoid, reclusive, etc.

8. by anonymous on Mar 10, 2010 at 12:22 PM PST

Ditto to James! I bought a Britta Purifyer for under the sink and metal water bottles. I feel better and save money!

I do not trust any government agency! I go inside and the truth always comes from me!!

D

Add a comment

Think before you type

Culinate welcomes comments that are on-topic, clean, and courteous. For the benefit of the community we reserve the right to delete comments that contain advertising, personal attacks, profanity, or which are thinly disguised attempts to promote another website.

Please enter your comment

Format: Bare URLs are automatically linked; use this style: [http://www.example.com "place text to be linked here"] for prettier links. You may specify *bold* or _italic_ text. No HTML please.

Please identify yourself

Not a member? Sign up!

Please prove that you’re not a computer


Advertisement
Our Table

Making meaty films

More-than-a-dream project

A campaign to bring meat know-how online.

Subscribe
Graze: Bites from the Site
Local Flavors

The beauty of breadcrumbs

Cherish the humble crumb

The Produce Diaries

Chia seeds

The latest superfood

First Person

Dinner of a lifetime

A changed man

Opinion

The evolution of fresh food

Back to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market

Most Popular Articles

Editor’s Choice