In the recent New York Times Sunday magazine devoted to food, health reporter Gretchen Reynolds briefly noted a Purdue University study that concluded a conventional meal pattern of three squares a day was actually a perfectly reasonable way to eat.
Why is this surprising? Because, as WebMD noted, many health specialists advise eating six small meals a day to avoid overeating and encourage weight loss. The study, heavily promoted back in March, declared that eating three regular-sized, protein-rich meals a day was more satisfying (and therefore less likely to lead to overeating) than eating six smaller meals throughout the day.
Caveats: The study followed a group of men only, no women. And as Reuters noted, the National Pork Board and the American Egg Board funded the study, so it’s not surprising that the study’s authors recommended that dieters should consume lean pork and eggs.
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Sweet on liqueursTake another look at these spiritsOur resident bartender welcomes a revival of the sweet stuff. |
ReviewsMycophiliaRevelations from the Weird World of Mushrooms | Our TableEgg-boiling essentialsMark Bittman’s gone back to basics |
Vine to TableGame for winePairing wild fare and the grape | The Produce DiariesMorelsPleasure in the hunt |
There are no comments on this item
Add a comment