The Oregonian’s Leslie Cole recently interviewed Shannon Hayes, who has a book out titled Radical Homemakers: Reclaiming Domesticity from a Consumer Culture. The idea behind the book? That being domestic can be radical, not merely traditional. As Cole writes:
The women and men Hayes profiles in her new book strive to eat locally, live on less, and untether themselves from a consumption-driven culture. They cook more, shop little, and make do with what they have. They strive to view decisions through the lens of family, community, planet, and social justice.
Cole goes on to profile a few Portlanders who exemplify the radical-homemaking ideal, including Sarah Gilbert, Chris Musser, and Gretchan Jackson. No radical-homemaking guys, though — for that, you’ll have to read Hayes’ book.
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Tomatoes in winterNo problem — when they’re cannedFind inspiration for winter dinners in a can of tomatoes. |
Local FlavorsThe beauty of breadcrumbsCherish the humble crumb | The Produce DiariesChia seedsThe latest superfood |
First PersonDinner of a lifetimeA changed man | OpinionThe evolution of fresh foodBack to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market |
There is 1 comment on this item
Add a comment
1. by Linear Girl on Apr 29, 2010 at 10:52 AM PDT
I do think it’s a traditional lifestyle, just not mainstream. If we forget for a moment the changes in the mainstream American lifestyle since World War II, this type of living would be how our grandparents lived going back many generations. The fact that it’s a radical rejection of current practices makes it no less traditional.
Tangentially, if one reads books on conventional farming written prior to World War II, “good farming practices” would nearly equate to the modern organic/sustainable model. So is the trend towards sustainability radical, traditional or both?
Add a comment