Nearly all of the seeds for sugar beets in the United States are grown in Oregon’s Willamette Valley. This winter, almost all of the beet farmers in the valley will be using genetically modified (GMO) seeds developed by Monsanto. A consortium of organic-seed growers, organic farmers, and environmental and consumer groups has filed suit in federal court in northern California to stop them.
The lawsuit alleges that wind-blown pollen from these GMO beets could contaminate nearby crops of conventional sugar beets as well as other closely related crops, such as chard and table beets, and harm the burgeoning organic farming and organic seed-production industries in the valley.
The availability of organic chard and table beets at farmers’ markets and stores could also be affected if the produce is found to be contaminated by cross-pollination (or outcrossing) between the GMO beets and nearby fields of organic vegetables. A European Union study conducted in 2001 found that wind-blown sugar-beet pollen could be detected up to five miles from its source. The state of Oregon only requires three miles of isolation between GMO fields and non-GMO fields.
The Center for Food Safety issued a press release that quotes the Sierra Club’s Neil Carman as saying, “As a consumer, I’m very concerned about genetically engineered sugar making its way into the products I eat, as well as genetic contamination of conventional and organically grown varieties of table beets and chard. It’s unacceptable for consumers to be exposed to untested genetically engineered ingredients in foods that aren’t labeled. At a time when consumers are facing multiple food-safety challenges, we don’t need more corporations messing with our food supply.”
Sift | |
| Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Table Talk: July 29Summertime meatless chatJoin Kim to talk about eating less meat (or no meat) in the summer. |
Our TableCook it all, anywhereThe How to Cook Everything iPhone app | FeaturesHow to bake eggsChef Jenn Louis breaks it down |
FeaturesSchool food cheat sheetThe federal government takes on school food | ReviewsNot just any barbecueThere’s ‘cue and then there’s ‘cue |
There are 5 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Frank Morton on Feb 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM PST
Consumers have more influence in the GM-food issue than any other group. We need to push for labeling of all Gm-products in order that choice remains part of our rights as consumers. If we do not insist on our right to know what the origins of our food are, we will soon be eating the cheapest food-like-stuffs that business can provide. Support a NON-GMO LABEL whenever it arises. Tell your grocer that you won’t buy GMOs if you have any choice in the matter. Write your representatives and insist on your right to know, and demand labeling.
2. by KAB on Feb 7, 2008 at 9:33 PM PST
Thanks, Frank, for the helpful information! (Frank is a seedsman and plant breeder in Philomath, Oregon, and is a board member of the Organic Seed Alliance, a plaintiff in the lawsuit against the USDA.)
3. by hungry on Feb 8, 2008 at 2:36 PM PST
Frank, you suggest supporting a non-GMO label whenever it arises. Can you give examples of places where it has arisen? Is state or national government making this labeling decision? Is the USDA supportive of a Non-GMO label, do you know?
4. by Kim on May 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM PDT
Today on the Huffington Post, there’s more on this topic — just in time for Mother’s Day candy buyers to give sugar a second thought.
5. by KAB on Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07 PM PST
The Oregonian recently published a follow-up story titled Oregon's Organic Farmers Fight Genetically Modified Seeds.
The writer also spoke with seedsman and activist Frank Morton, whom I profiled for a story in Edible Portland titled Plant a Seed and Watch it Grow.
Add a comment