Editor’s note: Wolke’s Einstein books follow a Q&A format. In this excerpt, titled “Germ Warfare,” Wolke answers a question from a reader on produce and pesticides.
What’s the best way to wash my fruits, vegetables, and produce to make sure there aren’t any germs, pesticides, and insecticides on them?
Nothing personal, but haven’t we become a bit of a paranoid society? Our drugstores and supermarkets cater to our fears (or do they encourage them?) by displaying dozens of antibacterial soaps, sprays, gels, lotions, hand washes, body washes, wipes, deodorants, and mouthwashes. Television commercials strike terror in our hearts by suggesting that there might be a germ or two lurking in our toilet bowls. (Well, for crying out loud, where are those poor little germs supposed to live?) I call it “bacteria hysteria.”
What does this have to do with food? A search of my unanswered reader mail (forgive me; I try) reveals 130 communications bearing the words germs or bacteria and 195 bearing some form of the word danger, referring to food contamination. It sometimes seems as if there are more people who are afraid of their food today than people who are enjoying it. Are we becoming a nation of verminophobes, mysophobes, toxiphobes, and sitophobes? (See definitions below.)
I generally avoid writing about health issues because I’m not a microbiologist, nutritionist, or physician. But I will say a few words about possible pathogens and toxins in or on our foods — in particular, on our fruits and vegetables. After all, they have inevitably been in contact with microorganism-harboring soil, and have possibly been subjected to agricultural chemicals such as weed killers and insecticides, not to mention manure and other “natural” fertilizers used to raise organic foods.
There have been several products on the market intended for washing our lettuce, scallions, tomatoes, apples, and such, presumably to remove both bacteria and toxic chemicals. In the fall of 2000, Procter & Gamble introduced a product called Fit Produce Wash, but they soon discontinued it and sold the formula to HealthPro Brands. At $5 for an 8.5-ounce bottle (no wonder it didn’t sell), it was a mixture of water, oleic acid, glycerol, ethyl alcohol, grapefruit oil, potassium hydroxide, baking soda, and citric acid.
Why these particular ingredients? The glycerol, alcohol, and oleic acid were presumably intended to dissolve and remove chemicals such as pesticides, which are generally insoluble in water. The potassium hydroxide attacked waxes, which are in any event approved by the FDA as harmless coatings for fruits such as cucumbers. As far as I can tell, the baking soda and citric acid were there only to react with each other to emit carbon dioxide gas, producing an Alka-Seltzer-like fizz to give the impression that the product was working hard.
Most experts say that washing vigorously in running water is the best bet. Running water will wash soil particles out of leafy greens, and that’s where the harmful bacteria, if any, are most likely to be hiding. Water won’t actually kill them, but neither will the produce-wash products, for that matter. If they did, they might leave residues of toxic (to humans) materials on the food. Moreover, if they claimed that they killed microorganisms, they would have to be tested for human safety and registered with the EPA as pesticides. (What irony!) So the produce washes sold to retail consumers are merely washes, not disinfectants. They’re especially good at washing money out of your pocket.
For skin-enclosed fruits, such as apples, tomatoes, pears, peaches, cucumbers, lemons, and oranges, a few drops of liquid dishwashing detergent applied vigorously with a brush and rinsed off well will do a good job of removing any contaminants. That’s an especially good idea for lemons and oranges if you intend to use their zest or peels in cooking.
One of the best defenses against bacteria on produce, which I employed when living in South America, is to wash the produce in a solution of about a teaspoon of chlorine bleach per quart of water. Because the tap water itself was suspect, I let the bleach solution stand for several hours before using it on the food, an unnecessary precaution here in the States.
Another safe and simple antibacterial treatment was devised in 1996 by food scientists at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. It consists of spraying the produce with hydrogen peroxide solution (the 3-percent strength sold in drugstores as a disinfectant) and then with white vinegar, or vice versa. The two liquids mix on the food and react to release germ-killing oxygen gas. Any residual hydrogen peroxide on your lettuce will decompose quickly and is, in any event, tasteless, while any residual vinegar will give you a head start on the salad dressing.
Both the chlorine-bleach method and the vinegar-and-peroxide method will also disinfect cutting boards and other food-preparation surfaces, especially after a scrub with detergent and a brush. If your cutting board reeks of chlorine after you use the bleach, a vinegar rinse will kill the smell.
While we’re on that subject, there are many commercial sprays in the supermarket for disinfecting everything from kitchen counters to entire bathrooms — but they are not meant to end up on our food. They contain alkyl dimethylbenzy ammonium chloride, a powerful catalyst that greatly accelerates the decomposition of esters and amides, which are major components of all living organisms from microbes to people. In high-enough doses this chemical will kill us, but it is present in commercial disinfecting sprays at a concentration of only 0.2 percent. Nevertheless, disinfecting sprays and wipes should not be used on surfaces, such as cutting boards, that will come in contact with foods.
Oh, yes, the definitions. A verminophobe is a person who is excessively afraid of germs; a mysophobe is a person who is afraid of dirt or contamination; a toxiphobe is a person who is afraid of being poisoned; and a sitophobe is a person who is afraid of food or eating, probably because he or she is already a mysophobe or toxiphobe.
For a list of other phobias, go to The Phobia List, unless you’re a logizomechanophobe, in which case you will probably never know what logizomechanophobia is.
Excerpts | |
| At our table sit many authors: cooks, critics, journalists, memoirists, humorists, and more. Join us here for excerpts from their work. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Do-over feverRevisiting September’s effortsWhat an essay, grape jelly, and my house have in common. |
Local FlavorsThe beauty of breadcrumbsCherish the humble crumb | The Produce DiariesChia seedsThe latest superfood |
First PersonDinner of a lifetimeA changed man | OpinionThe evolution of fresh foodBack to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market |
There are 2 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Carrie Floyd on Sep 20, 2007 at 8:43 PM PDT
On NPR today there was a discussion about how fruitless (ha, ha) veggie washes are. Jack Bishop, a Cook’s Illustrated editor, said the best way to clean hard-skinned fruits and vegetables is to spray them with a solution of one part white vinegar and three parts water, then rinse the said fruit/vegetable under water. This method, from his testing, was better than produce washes, brushing off the fruit (with either a brush or your sleeve), or plain water.
2. by anonymous on Jan 8, 2009 at 11:53 AM PST
Here is a published study (abstract of the report)that incuded testing of the Fit product: (the report stated that in the testing of Fit it killed Salmonella)
Ef cacy and Reproducibility of a Produce Wash in Killing
Salmonella on the Surface of Tomatoes Assessed with a
Proposed Standard Method for Produce Sanitizers
LINDA J. HARRIS,1* LARRY R. BEUCHAT,2 THERESA M. KAJS,3 THOMAS E. WARD,4 AND CHARLES H. TAYLOR5
1Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616-8598; 2Center for Food Safety
and Quality Enhancement, Department of Food Science Technology, University of Georgia, Grif n, Georgia 30223-1797; 3The Procter and Gamble
Company, 8700 Mason-Montgomery Road, Mason, Ohio 45040; 4The Procter and Gamble Company, Sharon Woods Technical Center, 11530 Reed
Hartman Highway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45241; and 5The Procter and Gamble Company, Winton Hill Technical Center, 6060 Center Hill Avenue,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45224, USA
MS 00-456: Received 20 December 2000/Accepted 22 April 2001
ABSTRACT
The reproducibility of a method developed to evaluate point-of-use sanitizers for fresh produce was tested at three different
laboratories. Mixtures of ve Salmonella serotypes were inoculated on the surface of ripe tomatoes. After the inoculum was
dry, tomatoes were placed inside a plastic bag and sprayed with sterile USP water, Dey and Engley (D/E) neutralizer broth,
or a prototype Fit produce wash (PW), an alkaline solution comprised of generally recognized as safe ingredients (water, oleic
acid, glycerol, ethanol, potassium hydroxide, sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, and distilled grapefruit oil), and rubbed for 30
s. The tomatoes were rinsed 10 s with 195 ml of D/E neutralizer broth (rinse solution), then combined with 20 ml of D/E
neutralizer (residual wash solution) and rubbed by hand to remove residual Salmonella. Populations of Salmonella were
determined for each tomato in the rinse solution and residual wash solution. Treatment with PW resulted in reductions in the
number of Salmonella 2 to 4 logs greater than those achieved with the sterile water or D/E neutralizer broth controls. Consistent
results were obtained across the three study sites, indicating reproducible results were obtained using the test method. The
method used to determine the ef cacy of killing or removing Salmonella from tomatoes in this study is suggested as a standard
method for measuring the ef cacy of sanitizers on tomatoes and other similar fruits and vegetables with rigid, smooth surfaces.
Add a comment