In the 1950s, coronary heart disease emerged as a leading cause of death. Scientists searched for reasons to explain this phenomenon, and one hypothesis suggested that the increase in heart disease might be related to the cholesterol levels in our blood.
Soon a theory was advanced suggesting that increased consumption of animal fat raised our cholesterol levels and resulted in heart disease. The link between cholesterol, saturated fat, and heart disease was only associative, not causal, and it did not account for the fact that some populations that eat diets high in animal fats (such as the French and the Inuit eating their traditional diet) don’t have high rates of heart disease.
During the following two decades, science failed to prove conclusively that there was any direct connection between eating saturated fats and developing heart disease, but the theory persisted. Then, in 1977, the theory gained widespread credence when the U.S. Congress endorsed it. Americans were urged by no lesser authority than their government to reduce their fat intake for the sake of their health. Thousands of years of human history showing the importance of animal fat in our diet were overlooked, and instead it was labeled the greasy killer.
While many experts still promoted a diet including eggs, meat, and animal fat, their voices were drowned out by industry and science. “Low fat” and “nonfat” became the new mantras, and since none of us wants to die any sooner than is absolutely necessary, we also obediently replaced the cholesterol-containing animal fats in our diet with new, man-made ones.
The first man-made fat was margarine, created in 1869 to replace butter. Although it was cheaper than butter, it wasn’t an immediate hit. At the beginning of the 20th century, lard, tallow, chicken fat, and butter were the top four fats in our kitchens. With the discovery of how to extract oil from plants and the development of the hydrogenation process, the number of industrial fats multiplied, and they became even cheaper.
These new fats were slow to gain widespread popularity, but the food industry loved them. They were inexpensive and extended the shelf life of baked and fried products, so they were soon incorporated into food products and prepared foods. When animal fat came to be associated with heart disease, these new oils and spreads were marketed as a healthy alternative, and their sales took off. By the end of the 20th century, not one animal fat made the list of the most popular fats for cooking; they had all been replaced by vegetable oils.
The campaign against animal fat was very successful, and it didn’t stop with cooking fats. The obsession with low fat spread to our meat. We rejected marbled beef, fatty pork, and plump birds, so producers responded by breeding leaner animals. Today few of us can look at a slice of pork belly or consider a well-marbled steak without a pang of guilt or, worse, fear, even though that pork belly and steak are much leaner than they were 30 years ago.
We lack the positive flavor memory that fat should trigger. This fear of fat extends to everything — especially butter. Recently scientists announced they have successfully bred a cow to give low-fat milk. Does that mean no more cream or butter?
Fat was also attacked on a second front. Not just bad for our health, fat became socially unacceptable. In North America, we are surrounded by cheap, plentiful food, and since in a society of plenty anybody can get fat, being plump no longer represents wealth.
“You can never be too rich or too thin,” the Duchess of Windsor is quoted as saying, and being thin has become the new ideal. To be thin is to be beautiful, rich, successful, and powerful, a message reinforced daily by advertising, movies, and the fashion industry.
Your weight reveals on which side of the divide you stand: rich or poor, powerful or impotent, with or without self-control. Fat has become entangled not only with health concerns but also with aesthetics, politics, and morals.
Bombarded from all sides by the food industry, medical celebrities, science, the government, and the media, how could we not be convinced? The amount of animal fat in our diet has declined, and we eat less than a quarter of the butter and a fifth of the lard that we ate in 1900, and low-fat proponents claim this is why there are fewer deaths from heart disease today.
However, a closer look at the data reveals that it is improved medical care that is responsible for the decline. The actual rates of heart disease haven’t abated, and obesity, diabetes, and cancer rates are all on the rise. What went wrong?
Excerpts | |
| At our table sit many authors: cooks, critics, journalists, memoirists, humorists, and more. Join us here for excerpts from their work. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Making meaty filmsMore-than-a-dream projectA campaign to bring meat know-how online. |
Local FlavorsThe beauty of breadcrumbsCherish the humble crumb | The Produce DiariesChia seedsThe latest superfood |
First PersonDinner of a lifetimeA changed man | OpinionThe evolution of fresh foodBack to the land — or at least to the farmers’ market |
There are 8 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Ed Bruske on May 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM PDT
Great post. What went wrong is it turns out that the real culprit behind obesity, hypertension, diabetes and atherosclerosis isn’t fat, it’s carbohydrates. Science has now pinpointed on a molecular level how carbohydrates, and the body’s insulin response to carbohydrates, is at the root of this cluster of diseases, now referred to as Syndrome X. Nature wasn’t wrong: humans spent 2.6 million years evolving on a diet of predominantly meat and fat. Carbohydrates are not even necessary for human health. By embracing the faulty low-fat policy, our federal government has spawned an epidemic of carbohydrate-induced diseases.
2. by Mike on May 9, 2009 at 5:01 AM PDT
This article is a mass of misinformation. If anyone doubts the connection between animal fat consumption and disease, read The China Study. Meat and Diary produce is a disaster for health. Every seen a fat person from China and their cancer rates and heart disease is but a fraction of ours in the West
3. by Arielle Lushan on May 10, 2009 at 2:12 AM PDT
What about moderation??? Portion control??? Carbohydrates are essential to a well-balanced diet, which provides energy as well as fiber which is necessary for a healthy colon. We may compare our diet to the French, who eat butter in so many dishes, high fat cheeses, as well as red meat.... but they eat leisurely and multi course meals that are not huge American-sized portions of bloody red meat, cheese, and butter. More than anything, our culture doesn’t know how to treat food... by processing everything and doling out enormous portions. We are a culture of extreme behavior. Eat, drink, and be merry, but in moderation! Oh, and don’t forget to exercise! Another downfall of American culture.... which doesn’t even instill the importance of regular leisurely walking.
4. by Rachael Warrington on May 12, 2009 at 7:00 AM PDT
100 years ago, society worked far harder than we do today. Just doing a load of laundry could consume a couple hundred calories, how many do you think it takes to turn the knob on the washer today? People walked, or biked, or rode a horse. We are the ones out of balance. We eat like we still expend 10,000 calories doing our choirs all by hand, yet we push buttons to wash and dry clothes, run a dishwasher, turn on the garbage disposal, run hot water, take a shower ect...Our bodies need so few calories because we do nothing, but we blame everything else around for our health problems. We blame everything but us. We choose to eat and not do anything but sit in front of a tv, computer, video games. Food is not going to kill us, our lack of respect for our bodies will.
I will read this book, because it actual makes a lot of sense….
5. by Holly on May 12, 2009 at 7:55 AM PDT
I’ve seen plenty of fat Chinese, thanks. One of the most famous Chinese martial arts of the early 20th century got fabulously fat after he went to live and work at the Emperor’s palace--he died at 53.
It’s amazing how people react so violently to the message that fat is not really bad for you and they’ve been conned by the American Medical Association.
The guy who wrote The China Study is a vegan. You expect him to be an impartial authority?
Look at the last two paragraphs of this article again:
“.We eat less than a quarter of the butter and a fifth of the lard that we ate in 1900.... However, a closer look at the data reveals that ...the actual rates of heart disease haven’t abated, and obesity, diabetes, and cancer rates are all on the rise.”
Food for thought.
6. by Holly on May 12, 2009 at 8:02 AM PDT
You know what else? I don’t know of a single real-life person who eats “huge American-sized portions of bloody red meat, cheese, and butter”--except for maybe me and my Chinese kung-fu teacher. (www.taihui.com) He’s 58 years old, as trim and fit as a 25-year-old. I’m 35 and still weigh 125 (go visit my blog if you want pictures).
Meanwhile, my best friend is moaning about the 30 pounds she’d like to lose. What does she have for dinner? Pizza and Chinese take-out.
Those of you who are lamblasting the low-carb mindset (and we do mean low-starch, really, not low-fiber, or low-veg) should try it for yourself before you criticize.
7. by Steve Harris on May 12, 2009 at 1:35 PM PDT
Syndrome X is now called insulin resistence. Insulin Resistence adds cortisol to your system. This cortisol makes it harder for cells to absorb sugars. In reaction the pancreas produces more insulin and blood sugar levels go up. Fats slow the digestion of carbohydrates. This process is also called metabolic syndrome. It contributes to arterial calcification and diabetes. Carbohydrates and fats have to be eaten carefully in conjunction proteins.
8. by anonymous on May 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM PDT
Here’s an interesting post on obesity in China. It focuses on consumption patterns of veg, carbs, and wheat.
http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2008/07/wheat-is-invading-china.html
Add a comment