We’ve been told that lard is the devil’s foodstuff so often that — despite the best efforts of food writers reminding us that lard is actually better for you than butter — we tend to shy away from the stuff. (Lard hasn’t been helped by the fact that the boxed, shelf-stable version labeled “lard” is actually nothing but unhealthy trans fats, instead of freshly rendered lard.)
The latest (and very funny) attempt to convince us to return to our “lard-ers” comes from the Guardian, with a blog post titled "Consider Lard." Author Oliver Thring touts lard for its versatility in the kitchen and its nutritional benefits, and shares a little history:
Before the Second World War, Britons ate lard without guilt or fear. Its disappearance from our kitchens parallels a surge in the national waistline and an upswing in the cosseted maladies of fat. It’s worth remembering that the very people who so trumpeted the benefits of factory margarine — which we now know caused considerably more harm than good — were the same who lambasted lard and denied its natural glories.
Here’s where we sort and report the latest in food news.
Want more? Comb the archives.
Most of the time with cooking and eating, the rules are clear.
A father’s legacy
The vegetarian-cooking pioneer
Barbecue, tamales, cocktails, and more
Good on everything