Cynthia Lair has been a member of the nutrition faculty at Bastyr University since 1994. She also stars in the humorous online cooking show Cookus Interruptus.
I was interviewed recently for an article about baby food. As those who have read my book Feeding the Whole Family know, I don’t really believe in “baby” food; I believe in “family” food. Therefore I thought it was very open-minded of the writer to have a conversation with me.
A few years ago, several articles were published that debunked the measured way we feed babies. Basically the experts were saying that the idea of offering food in some particular order is silly. They agreed that serving babies food with no salt, no spices, and puréed smooth enough to feed a dysphasia patient is unnecessary. One doctor called the whole belief system about the way we introduce foods to babies “mythology.” A subsequent article from these revelations was called “Enchiladas not cereal.” I couldn’t agree more.
Around the globe, babies are started on solids with a variety of foods. In Oceania, babies are given pre-chewed fish, grubs, and liver. The Polynesians prefer a pudding-like mixture of breadfruit and coconut cream. Inuit babies are started on seaweed and seal blubber, while Japanese health-care providers recommend a thin rice porridge, eventually made thicker and topped with dried fish, tuna, tofu, and mashed pumpkin.
Meanwhile, most American physicians and new parents still debate whether processed cereal from a box or processed fruit from a little jar is better.
To the rescue comes a slew of nouveau baby-food products. One company takes a respectable dish like vegetable curry, purées it, and puts it in a jar for parents to buy. This, of course, begs the question: Why not serve baby the curry dish the parents are having for dinner?
Another new product, called Homemade Baby (“homemade” — hello? Definition, please!), puts food in packages and trucks them in refrigerated units to your favorite high-end grocery store. There’s also a national brand of frozen certified organic baby food.
We have a cool new store in our area called Eat Local, where you can pick up pricey refrigerated prepared food for your family made from local produce. They have a section for babies, too, called Local Baby.
Stop the machinery! Feeding babies baby food is a really short-term project, maybe six months at most. The point is to get baby prepared to eat with the rest of the family, not be a cause for purchasing special prepared food so baby can learn to expect high-priced separate meals.
Recently the dad of a 14-month-old who had just purchased a copy of my book told me that he is addicted to fast food and that ain’t gonna stop, but he wants his son to eat really well. News flash: Kids eat what their parents eat. Does he believe that his boy will munch on raw organic carrots while his dad throws back tater tots?
OK, I’m ranting. But feeding babies can be such an intuitive no-brainer. Feed them a little of what you’re eating, mashed up. And if you’re not eating fresh real food — whole grains, fruits, vegetables, beans, nuts, eggs — clean up your act.
Dinner Guest Blog | |
| We invite people with noteworthy ideas about food to blog on Culinate. | |
Want more? Comb the archives.
| | Types of teaThere’s more to tea than bagsGreen, black, herbal, and more. |
| Most Popular Articles | |
|---|---|
There are 4 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by mamster on Jun 3, 2008 at 8:22 PM PDT
Yay! My four-year-old, Iris, has been eating table foods since she was seven months old. It’s easy, safe, and fun. Another great book on this topic, besides Cynthia’s, is Ellyn Satter’s Child of Mine. It surprises me when I talk to other parents and they’ve literally never heard of this idea, or worry that a baby can’t thrive on such a diet.
I’ve heard a rumor that a Culinate columnist is also working on a book about feeding babies and young children.
2. by Rose on Jun 3, 2008 at 9:37 PM PDT
I was really excited to see that the AAP actually recently changed it’s recommendation on avoiding foods to avoid allergies. It came out and said that there is no proof that avoiding foods after 4-6 months of age has any impact on developing allergies. After carefully following the “rules” of what to feed when with my daughter and making all her own baby food I’m really looking forward to being able to feed baby #2 what ever we are eating. Especially since following those rules did nothing to prevent my daughter from becoming allergic to corn. We switched her over to what we were eating at 1 and I’m positive that’s why she has such a broad pallet now at almost 3.
3. by cynlair on Jun 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM PDT
Thanks for your support on this topic. WE make everything so complicated in this culture and forget about the joy and simplicity inherent in eating.
Cynthia
4. by cafemama on Jun 5, 2008 at 1:43 PM PDT
i couldn’t agree more. the concept of giving babies bland purees from a corporate jar is insane to me, when i’m spending hours making a local, organic, seasonal meal, the ingredients of which i’ve carefully selected and prepared, for the rest of the family.
monroe and truman, my two youngest, have always gotten the benefit of my general rejection of the whole allergy concept (which never made sense to me, i’m so glad to see that the AAP is now agreeing!). i have to admit i even flout the whole concern about blue cheese and honey, since most of the baby’s diets are breast milk (packed with disease-fighters!) until they’re 14-16 months, anyway.
of course, now i’m stuck with a three-year-old who can eat a few ounces of rogue river blue cheese in one sitting, lick his plate, and ask for more, and a baby who always eats half my farmer’s market broccoli before i get home.
Add a comment