I’ve fallen down on the weekly Hollywood Farmers’ Market report, but suffice it to say this week was a quick buy-and-run, and last week we arrived way too late. Not only were there no breakfast burritos to be found, but also there was no lettuce for the week--and this was a few hours before the official close. Thus, my dear occasional readers, please indulge me in my diversion of asking if this is the right “F” in the FDA.
Much ink has been spilled (or many pixels have been lit?) over the Food and Drug Administration and whether they are adequately monitoring the nation’s food supply. I don’t want to cross that bridge, but this story I just ran across got me wondering whether this is the right type of food the FDA should be regulating.
According to this blog post, the FDA is considering my beloved Cheerios a drug. That’s right, those beloved crunchy Os that I enjoy for breakfast or bring to work for a snack in a reused Emerald Valley Kitchen salsa container (where my co-worker thought I was caring for a six-year old child instead of satiating my inner child), is considered a “new” drug because of the company’s advertisement that Cheerios can lower cholesterol. The blog post summarizes it this way: “Cheerios can’t say it reduces cholesterol without having gone through specific FDA-approved testing to back it up.”
Wow.
An earlier Culinate post by Kim here gave us some FDA numbers to ponder and she wondered whether the change in Washington would make our food safer. What do you think? Does regulating a company’s advertising claims of what is a healthy food (because most foods don’t tout their unhealthiness) make us safer? Should we hear those same ominous voiceovers on television as we do in typical drug advertisements?
I can see it now: an image of a family enjoying a picnic in the park with the latest brand of potato chips and the voiceover saying: “May cause high blood pressure, love handles, dehydration, or an irresistible urge to eat the whole bag in one sitting.”
(photo taken from Cheerios.com)
| | Ramp landThe exploitation of an unusual vegetableFeeling conflicted over heritage. |
The Produce DiariesMorelsPleasure in the hunt | Dinner Guest BlogA quiche lessonThe crux is the crust |
FeaturesFabulous favasA green herald of summer | Dinner Guest BlogWabi-sabi cookeryCooking is a constant history lesson |
There are 3 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by TRISTA on Jun 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM PDT
I’m all for labeling like you suggested, “may cause high blood pressure,” etc. But, just like labeling something “genetically modified,” it will never happen. Although the FDA ruling seems overboard to me, it illustrates how willing companies are to tout the devine (“lowers cholesterol!”) and how good they are at masking the negative (“has no nutritional value”).
Plus...does this mean that only drugs can lower cholesterol? I mean, vegetables help lower cholesterol...
Sometimes, I feel like I’m in one of those “Fun Houses” at the fair that warp and twist everything. What has happened to our food? The simple shape of your Cheerio image does not suggest the complexity, politics, economics, science, and confusion behind just about all food....
Your simple childhood favorite is not so simple, eh?
2. by Angela Pak on Jun 2, 2009 at 7:14 PM PDT
Many bureaucracies are created to protect idiots from themselves. I know that’s a rotten generalization, but I’m grumpy. How much unnecessary regulation could we avoid with a little common sense? Plus, why are we so obsessed with safety? Life is full of risk no matter how hard we try to avoid it. The FDA should be putting the brakes on some of those drug companies that are cramming their crap down our throats. Why are they allowed to convince us that going pee too often is a disease?
3. by Angela Pak on Jun 2, 2009 at 7:15 PM PDT
Oh...and I’m sorry that you could not enjoy your Cheerios in peace.
Add a comment