I enjoyed Tom Philpott’s observations from the Seafood Summit, which he describes as a “complex dance between the fish industry and the NGOs that monitor them.”
Like Philpott, I am very interested in the idea of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA). Now taht many of us understand the dangers of monocropping on land, it’s time to start drawing people’s awareness to the ways that large-scale aquaculture “tend to require huge amounts of inputs and throw off massive amounts of waste.”
On the other hand, he points out: The best sustainable-minded farmers figure out ways to “close the loop” through on-farm biodiversity.”
It’s a simple idea: “rather than let huge concentrations of fish manure from, say, salmon cages foul coastal waters, you place shellfish, which filter and are nourished by the manure, slightly downstream from your salmon cages; and then seaweed further downstream still, which takes up remaining nutrients from the manure.”
And, while very few fish farms appear to have this approach, it strikes me as such a no brainer.
| | Table Talk: July 29Summertime meatless chatJoin Kim to talk about eating less meat (or no meat) in the summer. |
Our TableCook it all, anywhereThe How to Cook Everything iPhone app | FeaturesHow to bake eggsChef Jenn Louis breaks it down |
FeaturesSchool food cheat sheetThe federal government takes on school food | ReviewsNot just any barbecueThere’s ‘cue and then there’s ‘cue |
There are 2 comments on this item
Add a comment
1. by Kim on Feb 6, 2009 at 8:27 AM PST
IMTA sounds like such a good solution -- thanks for drawing our attention to it. I wonder if, with greater awareness of all kinds of systems when it comes to our food, we can get to a point where we don’t have to constantly weigh our choices (e.g., eating fish is so good for you vs. eating fish is so bad).
2. by anonymous on Nov 30, 2009 at 8:11 AM PST
Irecently learned about IMTA at UniReeva
Add a comment